Agreement Under Coercion Is

Contract law, whether at the federal or regional level, can be very complicated. If you signed a contract but now think it was coercion, it may be a good idea to consult a business lawyer. A lawyer can investigate the circumstances surrounding the drafting of the contract and determine whether or not you were forced to sign the contract. While lack of capacity and duress are two of the most common reasons why a contract would not be applicable, several other situations may remove the validity of a contract, including: Contract laws according to government and federal standards can be very strict. You can hire a contract lawyer if you think the coercion may have been involved if you signed a contract. Your lawyer can help them by providing valuable legal advice and advice on your case. Similarly, your lawyer may be on hand during the duties to give you insurance and support during the trial itself. The common law expressed a narrow view of the concept of coercion, as it was actual or imminent violence against the person or unlawful detention. However, equity has adopted a broader “merger vision” on the type of pressure that could be a constraint for discharge purposes, and has since established itself. [10] Jose (Jay) is Senior Staff Writer and Team Editor for LegalMatch.

He has been with LegalMatch since March 2010. He contributes to the legal library of the company`s website by writing on a large number of legal topics. Its articles aim to provide understandable and readable explanations on legal issues often raised by persons with legal applications. Jose also contributes to the LegalMatch Law Blog, which covers current events and developments in the legal field. He wrote an e-book for LegalMatch entitled “Everything You Should Know About Hiring a Lawyer”.” Jose has a J.D. from the U.C Davis School of Law and a B.A. in Sociology from U.C Berkeley. In addition, he has experience in general digital marketing, REFERencing and content management. Although he doesn`t work, Jose enjoys listening to music and studying jazz guitar. The contract is required when a contract is entered into under conditions involving damage or threat of injury.

National and federal laws require that contracts be concluded “knowingly” and “voluntarily” by all parties. Therefore, when a party signs a contract for coercion, the contract is generally not considered legally enforceable. Professor Ronald Griffin, Florida Agricultural – Mechanical College of Law, Orlando, FL, simply imposes physical constraints: “Your money or your life.” In Barton v Armstrong,[8] Armstrong (accused) attempted to compel Barton (plaintiff) to act in connection with the sale of certain businesses by threatening to murder him. While the complainant took the threats seriously, there were other commercial reasons for signing the contract. An innocent party who wants to set aside a contract of coercion on the person only has to prove that the threat was made and that it was one of the reasons for entering the contract.

Comments are closed.