Germany Totalization Agreements

Although the social security agreements differ according to the conditions agreed by the two signatory states, their intention is similar. The main objective of such an agreement is to abolish the double social security contributions that apply when a worker from one country works in another country and has to pay social security contributions for the two countries with the same incomes. If a worker is not entitled to benefits in his country of origin or in the host country because the deadlines are not met, a totalization agreement between the two countries can provide a solution. The agreement allows the worker to add up the time spent between the two sites and to recover social security benefits in one of the countries, provided that a minimum amount is reached in one or both countries. If, for example, in the United States, the combined credits in both countries allow the worker to meet the eligibility requirements, a partial benefit may be paid on the basis of the proportion of the person`s total career in the paying country. In addition, many countries have complex social security systems, such as social security systems. B that depend on the nature of the work. In these cases, a totalization agreement should set out very explicit policies and restrictions that may not apply in other countries. While these considerations represent a challenge for the employer, it is important to recognize that there are currently a number of multilateral agreements (EU Regulation 883/2004, Iberoamerican Organization Social Security Agreement, etc.) or bilateral totalisation agreements (social security contracts between two countries) to allay concerns about contributions and benefit rights – thus making the employer`s job easier. This article discusses the scope and impact of these agreements in a selection of countries, as well as the potential social security costs associated with seconding a staff member on a temporary international mission. The agreements cover a period of two to five years depending on the host country and require at least one valid contribution in Canada to allow a person to receive benefits in Canada.

Derogations are only possible in the case of new agreements, for example. B with regard to the agreements with Brazil and Uruguay. These new agreements also allow for the pooling of insurance periods in several Member States and in the contracting country. The following lists reflect existing totalization agreements for other selected nations. In cases where there is no totalization agreement between the two countries, additional costs may be incurred by the employer.

Comments are closed.