Quite simply, this may in fact be the most awesome thing I have ever seen constructed in Lego. Zombie Apocafest. Valve made a contribution to this incredible build with a billboard for their upcoming title Left 4 Dead.
This is just way too cool…
Back in 1998, I had just graduated from college with a degree in computer science and was looking for a job. I had previously worked in technical support and hardware installation. I had also done some Novell network administration. What I really wanted was a programming job. There was a job posting that I recall quite vividly. One of their requirements for the position was “5 years experience with Java”. The problem was that the first public release of Java was in 1996, 1995 if you worked on Sun boxes. In order to have 5 years of experience with Java (1993), you would have had to have worked at Sun. There was another posting that asked for 10 years with Java, a feat not possible unless you had a time machine and repeated a few years since the project that would one day become Java began in 1991.
In the last ten years, things really haven’t changed. Really. I just saw a posting today asking for “20 years experience with Java” … 2008 minus 20 equals 1988… so they want someone with 3 more years experience than the guys who invented Java. Its frustrating to be looking for work and have to deal with crap like that.
Even more exasperating, however, is having positions require samples of your work. Seriously? I’ve been a programmer for the past 6 years, and in those 6 years I have worked on exactly ZERO projects where I was not under and NDA and taking code samples with me couldn’t be prosecuted as theft. I have 6 years of experience, but I have no samples of my work because it would be against the law for me to have them. Sure, I could send them samples of things I have done for myself, but I honestly don’t think WordPress themes and a party invitation managing webpage I wrote are going to be all that impressive to someone who is considering me for a senior level .NET/C# position.
I can only say… would you really want to hire someone to work for you under an NDA if in order to get the job they were willing to break the NDA of their previous job? That’s like being the other woman who’s lover leaves his wife and then being surprised when he cheats on you too…
Some times I really wish I could put aside my morals for personal gain. It would make getting a new job so much easier.
In a weird way, lately, I have been seeing more movies than ever. I’ve found a number of ways (available to anyone) to obtain passes to free screenings of films. If that were not the case, however, I would probably be seeing very few movies at all. Sure, I would make exception for events like The Dark Knight (which I actually paid to see… twice) but with all the theaters going up to $10 or more for a non-matinee price, it makes going to see a movie with the wife in the theater more expensive that waiting and purchasing it on DVD. At best, I’d go see a movie every now and then on a Saturday or Sunday morning, before noon, when they have $6 tickets. At least then it is cheaper for us than buying the DVD, but only barely.
The main problem is simply that many movies aren’t worth the cost of the ticket. If they lowered prices, I’d go more often. If it was $6 for the night time price and $3.50 for the matinee, I’d see a movie every weekend, maybe two. Yes, I would spend a ton more money, but I also wouldn’t feel like I am getting ripped off when I pay to see a movie that isn’t so great. $20 to see a movie that is crap just makes me never want to risk it again, but at $12… I more apt to keep trying.
At this point, the only movies I do feel any real need to see in the theater fall into two categories. One, event films, like the aforementioned The Dark Knight. Two, movies in 3-D.
In the past few years we’ve seen Beowulf, Journey to the Center of the Earth, and Fly Me to the Moon. Of those, only Fly Me to the Moon was not worth seeing. The other two I felt were good movies on their own, but shown in Digital 3-D those movies were fantastic. And as of yet, 3-D hasn’t made its way to the DVD player yet, so to see an enhanced film in all its glory, you have to see it in the theater. Something tells me that there are people in Hollywood who understand that.
Without a decrease in prices, frankly, 3-D films are about the only thing that will get me to pay for a film. Well, that and if Marvel and others can keep up the quality level of their superhero films…
I love the movie Joe versus the Volcano. In fact, it is my all time favorite film. I probably watch it at least three or four times a year. One of my favorite parts of the films are the early scenes where Joe is working at his dead end job. Mr. Waturi is having a conversation on the phone with someone, and he says things like “I’m not arguing that with you.” and “I know he can get the job, but can he do the job?” His entire conversation seems to consist of variations of those two statements repeated over and over.
When, in my career, I have had the opportunity to be in on the hiring process, as I read over people’s resumes, I often think of those scenes. Many resumes, and even interviews, paint pictures of people who can get the job, but in my experience, less than half of them actually can do the job. I mean, really do the job, not just skating by doing passable work waiting for the next job, but doing the job well enough that I feel truly good about having hired them.
Every time I get into the hiring process from the other side, I run into the same bump. My resume looks decent enough, and I can usually shine through the initial interview, but when it comes to the technical interview I usually wind up looking like a chump.
Here is my problem… when I have a job, I spend my time doing that job, to the best of my ability. I will learn everything I need to know for that job and I will exceed every expectation of my employer. However, if there is a skill not required for my job, I don’t know it. Not even a little. I simply have never found it beneficial to prepare myself for a job I don’t have. Well, I can’t say “never” because clearly it would be beneficial to the interview process, but doing so would likely infringe upon my job performance or my life outside of my job.
Every job I have ever had, I was completely unqualified for on a technical level when I got the job. In every case, I interviewed, they really liked me on a personal level, and I managed to inspire them to take a risk and hire me anyway. Within days I always bring myself up to speed, and within months I am indispensable to the team, leading the way and cranking out the work.
The issue is that in recent years, the technical interview comes first, and I never get in the room with people to be able to personally inspire them. I do a phone screen, which consists of technical questions, and if I pass I get to go in a room with a couple members of the team, either a PC or a white board, and be bombarded with more technical questions. Since I spend so much effort be great at the job I do have, I don’t have much left to put in to being great at jobs I don’t have. I fail the technical interviews every time.
I know I can do the job, but can I get the job? So far, too often the answer is “no”.
Having previously enjoyed David Wellington’s Monster Trilogy, and the first of his vampire books, 13 Bullets, I was eager to pick up his second vampire tale, 99 Coffins, when I managed to find one on the shelf.
Let me take an aside here and laud some praise on Borders Bookstores. Traditionally, I’m a Barnes & Noble guy, or even a patron of Book-A-Million. Their prices always seem to be better. Or when something is hard to find and if I can manage free shipping, Amazon is my go to site of choice. However, when it comes to picking up Horror books, Borders really does jump above other brick and mortar book retailers simply because they have a Horror section. See, when you go look for Horror in most stores you have to hunt for them. Stephen King and Dean Koontz, because they are well known, you’ll find in the Fiction section along side Tom Clancy and other novelists. But a lesser known author is more likely to be found in the Science Fiction and Fantasy section. It makes see what is new in Horror a difficult task. Not so at Borders. Walk right in and wedged between the Sci-Fi/Fantasy books and the Romance, you’ll find the Horror in a little 4 or 8 foot section all its own, and organized just like every other section… hardcovers and trades and new releases at the top with shelves of paperbacks below. Heaven.
Anyway… 99 Coffins picks up pretty much where 13 Bullets left off. Our intrepid vampire hunter, not feeling so spritely after the last book, calls on our heroine again. This time, it seems so fellows digging around in Gettysburg uncovered a crypt of sorts, and inside are 99 coffins containing 99 vampire skeletons missing all 99 hearts. But there is evidence… there might have been a 100th coffins. Vampires are afoot at America’s Historic playground.
Of course, I love the book. As good as the first, perhaps even a tad better. Honestly, I was worried. After the downward turn that Wellington’s second Monster book took in quality, I thought maybe he just might have problems with the middle acts of his trilogies, but 99 Coffins turned out quite well.
Now I just need to wait for the third book, Vampire Zero, just four short days after my birthday. The anticipation may just do me in…
It has been a while since I posted something for Zombie Wednesdays, and I hope with this post I am beginning a trend of doing so.
I am, by all accounts, a t-shirt and jeans sort of guy. T-shirt and shorts in the summer. I really don’t like dressing up nice because I find most “nice” clothes to be uncomfortable, especially anything with a tie. Wearing a tie is like voluntarily placing a noose around your neck… but I digress…
Knowing my love for zombies, and probably suspecting my love for t-shirts, a friend of mine sent me a link to this:
Zombie Day at the Mall t-shirt design @ © SplitReason.com
And that is just all kinds of awesome. As soon as I find a spare twenty bucks, that beauty will be on its way to my door.
for being fun and funny, but not overflowing with either
Hamlet 2 is a twist on a story that has been done before. The school is going to shut down the drama program and the teacher and his students have one last shot to put on a play that will save everything. Only, this teacher is a buffoon, and the play he decides to do is an original work, a sequel to Shakespeare’s Hamlet, where Jesus returns to the world, and then travels through time with Hamlet allowing him to save all the people who die in the original play. The production is punctuated with songs like “Rock Me Sexy Jesus” and “Raped In The Face” making the play in the movie is more fun than the movie itself for its absurdity.
If you are a huge South Park fan and live for that style of humor, then run right out and see Hamlet 2. You’ll love it. But if South Park isn’t your heart and soul, then you may want to pass on this one, or at least see it at a discounted rate.
Randy Pausch’s The Last Lecture is worth reading. And that is all I have to say about that.
Have you ever been talking with someone, regaling a story, and when you finish they immediately respond with a story of their own? One that somehow makes your story insignificant? Have you ever told someone something to which they respond that they disagree, but the reasons they give are completely out of line with everything you just said?
I have. When it happens, I try to notice, because most people who do this become obvious in their patterns. They are not really listening to you, they are waiting for their turn to talk.
The Internet is full of people with this problem, especially when it comes to game design. Take this thread for example. Where I linked to should be a post of someone saying that the upcoming Star Trek Online game should avoid being a DIKU clone like so many other games. He goes into a pretty elaborate tale of how things might work. The second reply following him is a post saying his idea would fail as a DIKU.
Ummm… duh? And the guy even quoted the entire original post, including the parts where the original poster said explicitly that it wasn’t a DIKU idea.
This is the sort of thing that makes conversation hard on the Internet. Some people know what they want to say, they are just waiting for an opportunity to say it. They don’t join a conversation so much as they look for an opening (no matter how ill fitting) and step in to criticize and spew their opinion. I mean, if a few people are talking about how to make great soups, what is the point of walking in and stating that, while their soups might be okay for people who like soup, a steak would be a better meal. It was a thread by people who like soup about soup… what the hell does steak have to do with it?
Sometimes people need to realize that if you can’t contribute to the topic at hand, then perhaps the best course of action is just to listen instead of trying to turn the conversation to something you’d rather talk about. It really makes message boards less enjoyable, especially when the same person keeps trying to hammer his point of view into thread where they don’t belong. If no one is talking about what you want to talk about… start a new thread, or at least propose that the thread steer another direction, don’t go hijacking.