I’m going to go ahead on record and say that this will be, in my opinion, the greatest television show ever.
Ev. Ver.
emptying my brain onto the internet since 1998…
The general category for posts on this blog.
I’m going to go ahead on record and say that this will be, in my opinion, the greatest television show ever.
Ev. Ver.
We all hate spam. Â But I suspect that some of you out there are ruining the Internet for the rest of us.
The good thing about spam is that either by content or by source 99% or more of it is fairly easily identifiable. Â Spam filters look for words or groups of words or sources or other characteristics of the content or sender to flag undesired emails and put them in the spam bin.
However, if you sign up for a newsletter, just because you don’t want it anymore that doesn’t make it spam. Â I have seen tons of people do this. Â Sadly, because spam filters often strive to be better they try to learn from items people manually mark as spam in order to better filter. Â Many legitimate newsletters get thrown in my spam folder, not because they are spam, but because other lazy people have been marking them as spam instead of unsubscribing.
And while I’m at it… Gmail? Â Just because I delete mail from a particular sender all the time doesn’t mean I don’t want to get their mail. Â Stop marking them spam. Â I’m deleting them because I don’t need them, not because I don’t want them. Â Cut it out. Â Unlike many people, I don’t keep emails that I’ll never need again ever. Â If I send someone an email and they send me back a “Thanks!” reply, I delete it. Â If I happen to send that same person too many emails, each of which they reply “Thanks!” to (which I like, mind you, I love when people acknowledge getting an email, that way I don’t have to ask them later “Hey, did you get my email?”) and each of which I delete, Gmail decides they must be spam since I keep deleting them and now I have to go to my spam folder every day and look for the falsely accused.
So, to recap… People, stop marking things as spam that are not spam. Â Google, stop marking things as spam that are not spam.
Thank you.
Are you a Facebook user? Â Do you like posting photos and status updates? Â Do you enjoy posting on people’s walls and having them post on your wall?
One of the main issues that I have with Facebook is the illusion. Â You log in and you are presented with your news feed. Â Over on the left you see the smiling faces of your friends that are online, and your feed is full of them telling you about random stuff. Â And see all this friend-centered stuff and you think, “Hey, I’ve got something to say, let me update my status and share it with my friends…” Â Who can really see that? Â If you’ve gone into your privacy settings then it might just be your friends. Â More likely, it’s your “Friends of Friends” or even “Everyone”.
You might have heard that horror story about someone who bitched about their boss and the boss saw it and it got them in trouble, so you haven’t friended your boss. Â However, you are unaware that your boss actually went to high school with someone who is your friend. Â You’ve got your status updates set to “Friends of Friends” which means your boss, who is a friend of your friend, can see that you just called him a twat, so maybe you don’t get that raise or promotion.
That photo you posted of your girlfriend meeting you at the door when you got home, naked with a beer and a steak… sure, the plate covered all the naughty bits, but you just posted that to your Mobile Photos album (since you uploaded it from your phone) and that album is marked visible by Everyone! Â That’s on the Internet now. Â Tagged and cached, for-ev-ver. Â The next time your girlfriend goes looking for a job, someone just might Google her name, see that photo and decide her future based on it. Â Maybe she doesn’t get the job… or maybe she does and her new boss treats her like a girl willing to have half-naked photos of her posted on the Internet… or maybe it doesn’t matter…
I prefer to err on the side of thinking that it matters…
A caution about privacy and the Internet might seem odd coming from a guy who blogs and mentions his real life now and then, but know that every tidbit of information I put into a blog post is carefully considered. Â I ask myself, “Do I mind if everyone knows this?” Â I have over 1,100 posts here and I’ve probably put just as many in the trash bin. Â It’s actually common for me to come here, write out a diatribe on the latest frustration at work or amongst friends, let it sit in draft form for a couple of days and then delete it. Â It’s one of the reasons I love blogging and haven’t been a huge fan of most social networks, like Facebook and Twitter, because they are immediate, there is less chance for careful consideration.
So, my Monday morning bit of advice this week is to go to your privacy settings in Facebook and make sure all your sharing is at levels you are comfortable with. Â At the very least, be aware of who can see what you say…
The other day, I went to tour a colocation facility. Â For the uninitiated, it’s a place to put your business servers so you don’t have to house them yourself (and maintain UPS and generators and other things like that). Â Outside this facility were some protesters. Â They had signs about unfair wages and other stuff. Â I found out from the employees that the reason for the protest was thus: this company decided to expand, took bids for sheet rock work, and accepted the lower bid, a company with a higher bid didn’t like it and claims the only reason the other bid was lower was because “that company doesn’t pay a fair wage”, but it turns out the upset company is a union shop and likely pays more due to contract not because it’s “fair”.
That’s fine. Â I understand, company upset, protests. Â But the kicker is, the protesters are not employees of that company or members of that union. Â The protesters are homeless people that the company is paying (well below the minimum wage) to stand there 24/7. Â I know, I asked, and protesters, when approached, often ask if you know about the protest and offer to give you details, they don’t usually ask for cigarettes and money – homeless people do.
Look. Â If you don’t care enough to do your own protesting, then I can’t be bothered to care about your protest. Â And the ironic part of paying people an unfair wage to protest unfair wages is not really helping you.
Besides, have you been inside? Â Their setup is freakin’ sweet!
I thought this was quite interesting, so decided to share. Â It’s long, but it makes a number of good points.
One of the great things about the Internet is how easy it has become to post and find job listings.
One of the horrible things about the Internet is that once you put your resume on one of these sites you can never ever truly get yourself removed. Â Take it off one site, you’ll find it on another. Â Get it off all the sites, you’ll discover that many placement companies have already saved a copy of your resume and contact information.
The only way to really be safe is, each time you start hunting for a job create a new email address (there are dozens of free email companies) and when you are done, abandon that address. Â And get a throw-away phone.
Anyway, I’ve never done that, and in fact I’ve always used an address on a domain I own (this one) and I use it for everything. Â So, despite having a job and not being on the market, I get emails, probably a dozen a week, about positions I might be interested in. Â The one thing all of these emails have in common is that they lack details. Â What’s even worse is that even if I were to respond and talk to them about the job, details would still be missing until I actually walk in the door for the interview.
What details? Â Simple stuff, like the name of the company.
See, if I get an email that says “.NET Developer position, 6 month contract, may go perm” I’m not really interested. Â I have a job, not a contract, and that just doesn’t make me want to consider jumping ship. Â If it said, for instance, “.NET Developer position for Amazon.com, 6 month contract, may go perm” I might want to go to that interview anyway, because, you know, working at Amazon might be awesome. Â Even if it isn’t something as awesome as Amazon, a company name means I can look them up and see if it’s something I want to be involved in. Â “.NET Developer” for a technology company, I’m intrigued. Â “.NET Developer” for Joe’s Country Plumbing and Septic Tank Repair… not so much. Â Sure, hiding the name might help get applicants for the latter, but it is also going to lead to disappointment for most. Â Better to be honest and actually talk to people who want to work for the smaller company.
Once upon a time, I got an email about a programming job. Â The details I got were that it was “a small company” and the position was for a “.NET Developer” and required experience with “data warehouses”. Â I went around and around with the recruiter trying to get more details, but she never gave any and so when I finally agreed to interview it was more out of exhaustion than excitement. Â I walk in the door and discover, oh by the way, the company is Hi-Rez Studios. Â Um, what? Â If the recruiter had lead with that piece of information, I’d have been chomping at the bit and probably brought in samples of my work and been a lot more prepared. Â Instead, everything I’d gotten lead me to believe it was going to be another endless stuff dull job like the one I was leaving, and I walked into the interview cold and shocked, dumbfounded and stuttering. Â I did manage to get a second interview, but damn, a little warning next time would be nice.
Another bad part is often a recruiter won’t tell you the name of the company until after they’ve submitted your resume. Â Problem is, many companies, when dealing with recruiters who get paid a commission for placement, have rules about excluding double submissions. Â So you might actually have the most awesome job listing in the world ready to submit me for, but if a competing recruiter has already submitted me then all you are going to do is get me excluded. Â Sure, you asked me where I’ve been submitted to try and avoid this, but your competitors use the same tactics so I don’t know where I’ve been submitted. Â And no, I’m not going to use just one recruiter when looking for work. Â Why should I limit myself just because you want to keep secrets?
And you know what? Â Stop putting things like “solid company” and “great work environment” in your email because it’s in EVERY email. Â You cheapen the meaning by using them for every company, especially when it’s marketing and not necessarily true. Â Of course they all say that. Â No company is ever going to say, “Tell them we are a large unwieldy mass of middle managers who micromanage with lots of unpaid overtime.” Â Not gonna happen.
Is a little openness and honesty too much too ask?
Yesterday, Hulu announced the details of their Hulu Plus plan. Â Of course, being the Internet, it was immediately filled with people saying it was too expensive, not enough content, and that the inclusion of ads was a deal breaker.
You know, on the content end, they are probably right, but that it something that will get better over time. Â But the price and ads… Â Think about your cable service if you have it. Â You pay XX for TV and XX for Internet access. Â In my case, with Comcast, those prices would be about $50 and $45 respectively (it varies based on the package you get). Â Personally, due to issues with Comcast not having a DVR capable of letting me record 6 shows at a time and their OnDemand service not having everything I already pay for for free, I kicked the TV part to the curb and just pay for Internet now. Â At the moment, I torrent, but it means I watch shows a day or two late — minimum (someone has to upload it before I can download it). Â But if Hulu were to give me access to even half of those shows on a completely OnDemand basis for $10 a month, even with commercials, I’ll take it.
And about those commercials… oddly enough, Ctrl+Alt+Del ran a related comic and rant. Â Are commercials really that bad? Â Yeah, sometimes they are annoying, but in general they are informative, about products or shows that might interest me, and then, if I want, I can go buy them. Â Since switching to torrenting, where they always edit out the commercials, I’ve been missing my advertising. Â New shows will pop up out of the woodwork and be a few episodes in before I’ve even heard of them (you know, because I don’t spend my time trolling TV Network and entertainment gossip websites). Â I’ll go to the store and see a product on the shelf and say, “Hey! This is great!” and find out that it’s been available for months, only I’d never seen an ad for it so I didn’t know it existed. Â And seriously, why is Hulu for $10 with commercials bad but cable TV for $50+ with commercials okay?
Personally, I’m excited. Â This sort of OnDemand a la carte TV watching is exactly what I want. Â Sure, torrenting is free, but I’d much rather support the shows I watch in some way AND not have to deal with the annoying limitations of cable TV providers. Â I just wish the Xbox version wasn’t being delayed to 2011.
Another RSA Animate video…
I don’t necessarily agree with everything said here, but it does make a number of good points.